|
T. E. Lawrence to William Yale
14 Barton St.,
Westminster
22.x.29
Dear Yale,
Robert Graves passed me your letter, and I have delayed
answering it, while I tried to borrow for myself a copy of my Seven
Pillars, to see what I said 10 years ago. However I've not found
one, and my leave expires on Thursday, so I must write from memory of
what happened in Damascus. [37 lines omitted about the Damascus Hospital,
see Seven Pillars Chs CXXI and CXXII] I left on October 4th, I think,
for England.
About the Lebanon
and Beyrout. I had secured a promise, from Feisal and
his staff, that they would leave it alone, for the European allies to
occupy. This promise was made me in Wejh, as Graves seems to have
stated. (I have no copy of Graves' book, either!) Upon the taking of
Damascus, Feisal and myself lost control. The Syrians (Ali Riza and the Bekri brothers) took charge, and galloped (metaphorically) straight for
the coast. My intention had been to occupy from the gap of Tripoli northward to Alexandretta, and I had told Feisal that in the welter which
would follow victory he would stand a very decent chance of getting this
area eventually allotted to the Syrian kingdom upon terms. I still think
that it was a possibility, and that the precipitate occupation of
Beyrout and Lebanon wholly threw away the local people's chances. Shukri
was sent to Beyrout by Ali Riza. I was much too engaged in struggling
with difficulties of Damascus to attempt to cope with Ali Riza. Anyway,
all my thought was of going home, where I meant to get transferred to
the French front. The eastern business was badly on my nerves.
There was nothing either Sherifian or mine, therefore, in the occupation
of Beyrout. I was opposed to it, on grounds of interest, and Feisal had
ordered his people to have nothing to do with littoral Syria south of
the Tripoli gap. You can support this statement, perhaps, if you will
see that no one of the Sherifs, or of the Arab army, or of us, went
there. It was entirely a Damascus move: as was the fatuous proclamation
of King Hussein in Damascus. These things were as much anti-Feisal as
anything. The Damascenes hoped to avoid the near activities of Feisal by
appealing to the distant Hussein, who hated Feisal. I had no intention
of proclaiming or creating any king in Damascus. Feisal governed it as
an army commander of Allenby's, an unassailable position. King Hussein
was a nuisance to me, only. If Shukri told you I had urged him to
Beyrout, it was probably that he was getting frightened at the magnitude
of his error, and wanted to make-believe that he had authority.
Your remark that 'British political officers were working to create a
situation in Syria which would make impossible... the Sykes-Picot
treaty' amazes me. The S-P treaty was the Arab sheet-anchor. The French
saw that, and worked frantically for the alternative of the mandate. By
a disgraceful bargain the British supported them, to gain Mesopotamia.
Under the S-P treaty the French only got the coast: and the Arabs
(native administration) were to have Aleppo, Hama, Homs, Damascus, and
Trans-Jordan. By the mandate swindle England and France got the lot. The
S-P treaty was absurd, in its boundaries, but it did recognize the
claims of Syrians to self-government, and it was ten thousand times
better than the eventual settlement*
In justice to England I must add that financial pressure, the
Mesopotamian rebellion of 1920, and perhaps conscience aroused by my
agitation in London, did finally persuade England to abrogate, de facto,
her mandates in Irak and Trans-Jordan, though she still holds them, de
jure, to exclude third parties. It is my deliberate opinion that the
Winston Churchill settlement of 1921-1922 (in which I shared)
honourably fulfils the whole of the promises we made to the Arabs, in so
far as the so-called British spheres are concerned. If we had done this
in 1919 we could have been proud of ourselves. The French had made no
promises, and they refuse to adopt our liberal policy. That is a pity,
but past our curing.
This letter has grown too absurdly long. As if anybody now cares what I
did, or you did, or England or France or the Arabs did, ten years ago.
Leave it for 50 years. If Irak continues to put up a decent show, across
three generations, then the Arab Revolt was worth while. In our
lifetimes we cannot reap either credit or disgrace: and after I'm dead
my bones will not care. Winston's settlement so pleased me that I
withdrew wholly from politics, with clean hands, I think, and enlisted
in the Air Force, where I have the happiness to be, still. It is not
glorious, but very free of cares, healthy, and interesting. I have not
been to the Middle East, or read a book or article about it, or written
or received a letter thither or thence, since 1922 when I joined the
R.A.F.
You say you want to read
The Seven Pillars. It is a rotten book, a dull
book, hysterical, egotistical and long. It is also (God be praised)
rare. As I said, I can't borrow a copy, here, for my own reference in
writing you. I believe some copies did go to U.S.A.; but they say it's a
large country. Mrs Lamont had one. Doubleday the elder had one: also
Kermit Roosevelt. Speculators pushed its price into hundreds of pounds,
and
all wise people promptly unloaded: so I hope they have parted: for the
thing has slumped. That's the English edition. There is also a U.S.A.
edition, not complete. A copy of this is available, I fancy, in Congress
Library at Washington: but how Washington lies from New Hampshire I
don't know! Believe me, if you don't see it you miss nothing.
Oh! peace negociations! Feisal and Jemal were carrying on quite serious
peace negociations all 1918. I saw both sides' letters unbeknownst: I
should have been morally indignant with Feisal, only England was
secretly negociating with Talaat, also to my unofficial knowledge, all
1918 too. All is fair in love, war, and alliances. Poof! Me for the Air
Force!
Yours sincerely
T. E. Shaw
*This should be qualified. There was a secret Paris settlement, a
working arrangement between Clemenceau and Feisal, which had germs of
hope: Millerand tore it up, and launched Gouraud on Damascus with his
army!
 |
|